Can zero-shot learning reduce annotation costs?
Yes, zero-shot learning (ZSL) can significantly reduce annotation costs. It enables models to recognize new classes without requiring labeled training data specific to those classes.
ZSL reduces costs primarily by leveraging existing knowledge and semantic relationships (e.g., attributes, descriptions) learned from base classes to infer unseen classes. Key considerations include the necessity of a pre-existing knowledge base linking seen and unseen classes and the quality of the model's initial training. Performance often hinges on the accuracy of the semantic embeddings and the robustness of the knowledge transfer, potentially trading off some accuracy compared to fully supervised methods.
Its core value lies in efficiently scaling models to handle new categories and domains without expensive labeling efforts. It is particularly valuable in dynamic applications like image recognition (identifying rare species), NLP (new slang/entities), and recommendation systems, where continuously collecting new labeled data is impractical or cost-prohibitive.
関連する質問
Is there a big difference between fine-tuning and retraining a model?
Fine-tuning adapts a pre-existing model to a specific task using a relatively small dataset, whereas retraining involves building a new model architec...
What is the difference between zero-shot learning and few-shot learning?
Zero-shot learning (ZSL) enables models to recognize or classify objects for which no labeled training examples were available during training. In con...
What are the application scenarios of few-shot learning?
Few-shot learning enables models to learn new concepts or perform tasks effectively with only a small number of labeled examples. Its core capability...
What are the differences between the BLEU metric and ROUGE?
BLEU and ROUGE are both automated metrics for evaluating the quality of text generated by NLP models, but they measure different aspects. BLEU primari...